The very long focal length lenses are considerably more expensive than extenders. Always try and use a central (or at least cross-type) AF point instead of all the AF points. The following list of discontinued lenses fitting these parameters are compatible, but may require camera microfocus calibration for accurate focusing (note that not all DSLR cameras support microfocus calibration): Canon EF 200mm f/1.8 L USM Lens
But which one is the best? Bogen/Manfrotto 3021 w/3265 ball-mount. Canon EF 500mm f/4L IS II USM Lens and
Going all the way back to the version 1 T-Cons, the 1.4X when mated with a Canon big white prime always appeared to have no impact on image quality, yet did slow AF.With each new version, with compatible lenses, the impact on AF speed has been reduced, and with the introduction of the MkIII T-Cons and the bodies of that era starting with the 1DXII and 5D4, all impact on AF was gone. There is a used 2x II in my area right now, so wondering what would be the downsides with the II compared to the III . Finally, theres build quality the III is made from higher-quality materials than the II. Tools. 03/30/2023: Product Advisory for EF50 F1.2 L USM. As such, its often best to switch to manual focus when using an extender. I have the 70-200f2.8isII and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII. There is a noticeable difference between the EF and RF 2x TCs on the EF 600/4 II, with the EF 2xIII delivering sharper results in the center and periphery. On an APS-C sensor camera body, the effective focal length range is 150-600mm. In order to maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. EOS 1Ds Mark III EOS 20D EOS 1D Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles Articles . Another thing to keep in mind is that your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender attached. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens becomes a 360mm f/7.1 USM Macro Lens. I'll let you decide which ones are . Its well-made, its easy to use, and its very affordable. IMG7 = new Image(604, 404)
a huge article about this trip if you are interested in this here. It multiplies your focal length by 2x and makes your effective aperture two stops less. Canon EF 2x Extender II it replaces. As long as it's a f2.8 version then it's worthwhile considering an extender. With that said though I didnt see as much of an appreciable difference between this new MKIII 2x and the older MKII as I saw in the 1.4x versions. 7D gripped XTI gripped The Canon EF 2x III Extender significantly extends the reach of your sharp, compatible Canon lenses for a relatively low size, weight, and financial cost -
You always have to give something to gain something. IMG9.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/14x-Extender-20x.jpg'
Like the 2x II, the Canon EF 2x III Extender is weather-sealed and very-solidly-built -
The biggest difference you see when swapping from a 1.4x to a 2x extender is the instant change in AF tracking accuracy. IMG12.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg'
Sharpness is much improved over previous versions. I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it is noticeably better. I did some systematic test shots of a Coke can, two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs without the 1.4 - it was impressive! -EF 35-350mm f/3.5-5.6L USM For example, if youre using a 100mm lens with a 1.4x extender, then youll effectively have a 140mm lens. The 2X TC II never worked at all well for me so I sold it years ago. The new mark iii 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions. In terms of performance, the Canon Extender EF 1stops down one stop when attached to most lenses1stop on telephoto lenses), meaning that youll need more light than usual in order to take photos without increasing ISO too much2). This means that well need to compensate by either opening up our aperture or increasing our ISO settings. A great lens will typically produce the best image quality when used with the 2x and
Others might find that the drop in sharpness isnt worth the extra reach. I believe it will also autofocus faster with certain newer lenses like the 70-200f/2.8L II IS and the II Super Telephotos. Nov 22, 2020 15:32 | #1 I've tried to do some research on this before posting, and the consensus of what I can see online is that: - For 1.4x the difference in IQ between the II and III is minimal - For the 2x the difference in IQ between the II and III is enough that it's worth getting the III over the II. Combining the focal length multiplier and the maximum aperture reduction provides your resulting lens equivalent. A Canon EF 70-200mm f/4.0L Lens mounted over a 2x becomes a 140-400mm f/8 lens. But if youre looking for the absolute best image quality, then go with the III. The 1.4x III adds some barrel distortion to the lens it is being used with. Third is image quality the III produces slightly sharper images than the II. http://www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct&articleID=3602Scroll down and there's a good explanation about the III series. These results show what a very sharp lens, stopped down to f/11 and used with good lighting can produce with extenders. In the above photo the car is coming at me at at least 150MPH. I don't use extenders a big percentage of the time, but I often have a 1.4x with me. The answer is yes! The most significant differences between one version and the next, besides improvements in the optics, is updating the extender to take advantage of newer camera bodies and lens releases. KSM filters for all Canon EF 400mm f/4.0 DO IS USM Lens
Canon 1D-Series: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with all cameras in the 1D series. The Xplor 600 is slightly lighter than the Pro, weighing in at 2.65kg compared to the Pros 2.75kg. CorrectYou can always use the kenko TCs, Sebastien5D mkIII ; 17-40L ; 24-105L ; 70-200L II ; 70-300L ; 35L ; 85/1.4 ; 135L ; 100macro ; Kenko 1.4x ; 2x mkIII ; 580EXIIM5 ; M1 ; 11-22 ; 18-150 ; 22/2.0 ; EF adapter; Manfrotto LEDBenron Tripod; ThinkTank, Lowepro and Crumpler bags; Fjllrven backpack. The 2x II added pincushion distortion to the lens it was used with whereas the 2x version III adds slight barrel distortion.Feb 3, 2011. With the MkIII, the only IQ improvement I can actually see is a reduction in CA.With the 2X, every time the 2X was supposed to have improved optics/image quality. The attachment is made from durable metals and polycarbonates, and it features weather-resistant gaskets to protect your camera gear from the elements. | Hosted by Kinsta. If you think you will benefit from having a longer focal length available to you on a regular basis, then the Canon 1st 4 extender could be worth the cost despite its drawbacks. From reading the description of the III from Canons site, and sending them an e-mail because I was considering upgrading from II to IIIthe III is more strictly designed to take advantage of the new II lens line such as the 300 f2.8 II or the 70-200 f2.8 II etc. If it is, the resulting 2x focal length is very impressive. Canon EF 400mm f/2.8L II USM Lens (non-IS)
[ very little use so far , but specs say it does slow down AF . The Canon Extender EF lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon. Keep in mind that you can probably buy the 1.4 and 2X II for the price of either III . Canon EF 2.0X III Telephoto Extender for Canon Super Telephoto Lenses (Renewed) Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L is II USM Lens, Lens Only VILTROX C-AF 2X II TELEPLUS 2.0X Teleconverter Auto Focus Telephoto Extender Lens Converter for Canon EF Mount Super Telephoto Lens 70-200mm 100-400mm and DSLR Camera 80D 5DII These lenses are used between any compatible EF type lens and any of the Canon EOS line of cameras. The image quality of lenses varies from model to model; and therefore, the optical results of the various with-extender combinations also vary. These are the prices you pay for using an extender. F8 is definitely a sweet spot though in these examples. With Extender EF2X III, the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops. Comparing Canon's 300mm f2.8 Ls - MKI Vs MKII, Unboxing the Canon 200-400 F4 L IS 1.4 Ext, Checking Out The New Canon 50mm f/1.8 STM. Much the same story here with the 2x extenders. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens
Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS USM Lens
This one used an EOS 5D Mark III + EF 1.4X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport: Both of the following images were captured using a Canon EOS 6D + EF 2X III + Sigma 120-300mm f/2.8 DG OS HSM Sport. Well, never fear! As for the improved optics, most reviewers have indicated that the difference in IQ between the 1.4x II and III is pretty slight, while the difference between the 2x II and III is more noticeable. Super Spectra coatings were introduced to help reduce ghosting and flare as well as fluorine coating to make water spots and finer prints easier to remove. That would cost you only one stop,making your lenses a much more manageablef/5.6. The Mark III also has much less CA (although when shooting RAW lots of CA can be fixed up anyway, if not quite entirely). So there is some new technology hidden inside these things that we have yet to unlock and as such I cant really comment on that new aspect. As a rule, but subject to change, the Canon lenses compatible with the Canon EF 2x III Extender include fixed focal length L lenses with focal lengths of 135mm and longer,
The latest version of the Extender EF 2x III, on the other hand, is compatible with all current Canon EF mount lenses except for two: the EF 400mm f/2.8L IS II USM and the EF 600mm f/4L IS II USM. The obverse is not true. Canon U.S.A Inc. All Rights Reserved. Thanks again for the speedy response. Since many Canon EOS camera bodies need a max aperture of f/5.6 or wider to autofocus, losing 2 stops of max aperture pushes f/4 and narrower lenses past their ability to autofocus. "As with previous EF Extenders, usage of Series III EF Extenders lowers AF drive speed to improve AF performance. Anywhere near the edges at all, the Mark III is noticeably sharper though. Canon EF 200mm f/2.0L IS USM Lens
The 2x on the other hand is only worth having if you cannot get the same shot in another way. If you only occasionally need a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender might not be worth the cost. Canon 1dmk4 , iso 2000 , f11, 1/800, 600mm (300mm + 2x MKIII). Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? Extender Model: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: 1.4x II: 2x II: 1.4x III: 2x III: Actual Aperture: f/5.6: f/8: f/5.6 . The Extender EF 1.4X III from Canon is designed for select Canon EF mount L-series telephoto lenses. Registered members may log in to forums and access all the features: full search, image upload, follow forums, own gear list and ratings, likes, more forums, private messaging, thread follow, notifications, own gallery, all settings, view hosted photos, own reviews, see more and do more and all is free. But, Canon does not recommend using ETs at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy. In fact when the 1.4x II was released, it was said that weather sealing was added, superior optical coatings, but the lens assembly was unchanged. The Canon EF 2x III Extender reduces contrast and sharpness
now, this may have had something to do with performance and IQ of 1dmk4 compared to my 40d but the difference is undeniable. IMG11 = new Image(600, 404)
Take from that what you will, but to me is says Canon are very proud of their performance. Thus the only released version II telephoto released so far is the 70-200 f2.8 IS II, and thats often what the version II Vs III TCs were tested with. I need more reach. I own the 1.4x II and III, AF improvement alone makes the 1.4x III worth the cost. Is the 1.4 v III extender worth the extra $170? Canon 1dMK4 , iso1250 , f11, 1/1000 , 420mm. The accuracy of the AF does not seem to be effected with the new versions though, I really cant say that I saw any discernible difference in that area. Canon 6D: The 1.4 extender iii is compatible with the Canon 6D. The 300mm and 400mm are expected first, with the 500mm and 600mm following in December (2011). And I'm sure that not everyone can justify the cost difference to go with the 2x III over the 2x II. But, saving money is one of the reasons to buy an extender instead of a lens with a longer native focal length. counter the pincushion distortion to a small extent. Here are some tips to get you started. If you own the current MKII extenders then there is certainly no need to rush out and buy the new ones unless you also plan on picking up one of the new 300,400, 500 or 600mm lenses. -- IMG12 = new Image(600, 404)
MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. Has anyone out there tried both and able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the newer version is worthwhile? Shown below are 100% resolution crops taken from the focal length example shown earlier in the Canon EF 2x III Extender review. The biggest downside to using a 2x extender, in my opinion, is the image quality reduction it causes. IMG9 = new Image(604, 404)
Carrying a 300mm and 2x for example is a great weight saver over taking a 600mm lens. However, if you frequently find yourself needing a longer focal length, then the Canon 1.4 extender could be a worthwhile investment. The RF 2x actually performs pretty much identically to the two 1.4x TCs stacked (which yields the same final 2x magnification as the 2x TC). The extenders do not have provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK. The difference between the II and III is quite small as other's have pointed out and you'll be saving a fair amount of money especially if you pickup one a used one. L's 35-350 , 70-200 MK II IS I have a 1dxii and a 400mm 5.6L. An extender is a lens attachment that increases the focal length of a camera lens. Its noted on the Canon website : To ensure lens optical performance and autofocus performance remains high, both extenders feature an integrated processor to transfer all focus and lens information back to the camera. The older MKII always used to be good at AF tracking anyway so I wasnt surprised to see it handle these cars quite well. If you want a 2x TC, then the III may be the better choice. The 2X imparted a much bigger hit on AF speed than the 1.4x. With the MKIII T-Cons and the most modern DSLR AF Systems these "brakes" were finally removed. The first thing to note is that all Canon 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses. an extension tube installed between them makes the fit possible. It was however great for shooting the moon.I recently purchased the Canon R6 and have used both the 1.4xIII and 2xIII with the 100-400 II lens and been really pleased with the results and I feel the 1.4x III produces much better results on the R6.I think with really good light there would be very little loss in image quality with either the 1.4 or 2. Canon EF 180mm f/3.5L USM Macro Lens
Here are some things to keep in mind when using this popular teleconverter: In this post, well be taking a detailed look at the Canon Extender EF 1.4X III. If you have an IS Mark II super-tele then it apparently makes the focusing more accurate. Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM Lens
In these lighting conditions though there is a noticeable drop in the number of tack sharp keepers but the rate is still reasonable. Canon EF 500mm f/4.0L IS USM Lens
| All content Dan Carr - As an Amazon Associate Dan earns from qualifying purchases. The Canon Extender EF 1.4x III and Extender EF 2x III teleconverters would be compatible for use on the Canon EOS Digital Rebel T7 DSLR camera and the Canon EOS 90D DSLR camera. A step up!! The only advantage would be in the weather sealing arena. In June 2011 I had the opportunity to head to France and shoot the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the worlds greatest motor race. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon Extender EF 1.4X III Teleconverter -Near Mint- #62 at the best online prices at eBay! Canon 1dmk4 , iso1250, 1/800, f8.0 , 420mm (300mm + 1.4xMKIII). Canon EF 135mm f/2.0L USM Lens
IMG4 = new Image(604, 404)
It multiplies your focal length by 1.4x and makes your effective aperture one stop less. Of course, there are some trade-offs when using an extender. The Canon EF 2x III Extender mounts between your Canon EOS Digital SLR and a compatible lens (primarily Canon L Series lenses), extending the focal length of the lens by a very noticeable 2x. IMG3.src = 'https://media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/2x-Extender.jpg'
The 2xIII works nicely on the 70-200II however focusing speed is reduced by 50% so be aware of that. After spotting an article in the local paper that a Spitfire aircraft is flying over in a couple of weeks time I've started looking at extenders. https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1296858/0#12372013, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1002804, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1334727/1#12733577, https://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1460120, http://i160.photobucket.com/albums/t172/Paddywacked/Fred%20Miranda/7D__4843_zpsj3c1igvf.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/131920218/original, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/72483366/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/145804734/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/144892044/original.jpg, http://www.pbase.com/liquidstone/image/146201228/original.jpg. when any 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0, f/11, f/16. But what if youre not sure if its compatible with your camera? The Canon 1.4 extender is an expensive piece of equipment, so you want to be sure that it is worth the investment before purchasing it. I have the 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM lens, so after reading the replies I think I've decided on the 2x III. Maybe someone who upgraded I to II can handle that part of the question. Great link, thanks! If price isnt an issue, go for the Canon 1.4 Extender III. but as their image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can function with extenders. The II or the III? (and this is of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens' FOV). This means that the III will give you a wider field of view and more background details in your photos. Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens is able to capture. Buy a lens with the native focal length you need for best results. With all the information you need in one place, you can quickly and easily find out which lenses are compatible with this popular Canon teleconverter. This means that youll be able to shoot at longer focal lengths than without the extender. The Canon Extender EF 1.4X III is a compact and lightweight attachment that can be added to select Canon lenses. A microcomputer integrated into the Series III Extenders promises faster autofocusing and increased AF precision
If you need a little extra reach, then the II is a great choice. magnification, I shot with the mirror locked up AND using a cable release to try and eliminate mirror slap, I used a solid tripod and ballhead from Really Right Stuff, No extra sharpening was applied to the images, they were shot in RAW and processed in LR3. Here is an example of the focal length increase provided by the 1.4x and 2x extenders. Do note that this converter is only compatible with fixed focal length L-series lenses 135mm and over, as well as the EF 70-200/2.8L, EF 70-200/2.8L IS, EF 70-200/4L, and EF 100-400/4.5-5.6L. The lens extender is impervious to nearly all weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals. Canon TS-E 24mm f/3.5L II Tilt-Shift Lens
The increased sharpness of the image is noticeable and with the higher iso quality of the 1dMK4, shooting at 800 or 1000 is no big deal at all. This gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and an 800mm f/8. Canon claims AF speed reduction of 50% with a 1.4x and 75% with a 2x extender. Always buy the best / latest you can afford . Overall, the Canon Extender EF 1is a well-built and effective way to increase your lens focal length by 1 47). Take a look at the 100% crop from this image below to see the detail that was produced. Ultimately, its up to each individual photographer to decide whether or not a 2x extender is worth it for their own needs. According to Chuck Westfall (Canon USA):
Note that barrel distortion causes the center portion of the image (top image in the ISO 12233 tool) to be slightly enlarged,
This for me is more impressive. CANON 5D MK3, EF 24-70mm 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm 2.8 IS L II, EX580 II. http://www.dpreview.com/news/1008/10082611canonef14xiiief2xiii.asp, Sigma 50mm F2 DG DN Contemporary sample gallery, Sigma 17mm F4 DG Dn Contemporary Sample Gallery, The best cameras for family and friends photos in 2022, Best affordable cameras for sports and action in 2022. I believe the OP has the older NON-L version of the 70-300 IS. Excellent sharpness and details at F/5.6 . Can you stack them together? two at 400mm and two at 300mm, with my new Canon 100-400mm mark ii lens and there was virtually ZERO difference between the shots with vs . Image editing and C&C always OKGear list plus: EF 1.4X II . Extender EF 2X III meets necessary standards in terms of rugged, dustproof and water-resistant construction, and should be in every professional's camera bag. Is the Canon 1.4 Extender III still a good option for you? If youre a Canon shooter, then youre likely aware of the Canon 1.4x Extender II. Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference and what kind of results youre looking for in your photos. I hope to get one of the new super-tele lenses myself so I will post an update when that happens. Find many great new & used options and get the best deals for Canon EF 2X III Lens Extender Converter EXCELLENT EOS DIGITAL Camera 3 II 1.4x at the best online prices at eBay! But how do you use them? Not an expert but I asked the same question a couple of years ago.the II is well worth buying over the Ihandled AF better etc. The slight difference in color can be seen with the MKIII extender and this 500mm f4 L IS New larger lens release button on the MKIII versions MKIII on the left and MKII on the right. The change in size and weight of a lens with the 2x III installed is enough to be noticeable. I would never use an extender in bad quality front lit situations where contrast is already bad. Since many telephoto zoom lenses have pincushion distortion at their longest focal lengths, the added barrel distortion can
I personally think that with my current camera the 1.4TC is a better choice for this lens. And, thats pretty much it. Canon Rebel Series: The 1.4 extender iii is only compatible with rebel cameras that have an EF mount, such as the Rebel T6s and Rebel T6i . Never ever buy a lens with the intention of using an extender on it most of the time because of course there IS going to be degradation of the performance. The III's new color matches Canon's latest white L lenses. I would however use an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees to my subject or more. Another key difference is that the II has a maximum magnification of 0.7x, while the III has a maximum magnification of 0.5x. But which extender is compatible with which lens? Starts improving from F/6.3 onwards till F/8.This leads to high ISO but used with R5 or R6 this will not lead to noise issues as these two mirrorless bodies handle high ISO very well as being reported. Canon have indicated this will be a different case with the newer lenses but as yet that is unproven. If youre a Canon user, then you know that the 1.4 extender iii is one of the most popular camera accessories on the market. 03/30/2023: New firmware updates are available. That can be very useful for wildlife or sports photography when you want to get just a little closer without spending money on an entirely new and longer lens. If I bought one today, the Mark III. If you have read the Canon 1.4x EF Extender III Review, you will find the Canon EF 2x III Extender review familiar. Canon TS-E 17mm f/4L Tilt-Shift Lens
Thanks for everyone weighing in! A few days after posting this I splurged on an R6 - so this is something to know for when my savings recover now!The information here been invaluable though. Looks like the original 1.4 is not a bad choice, for the right price. F11, 1/800, f8.0, 420mm model to model ; and therefore, the 2x. Your effective aperture two stops less from qualifying purchases image below to see it handle these cars quite.. Prices you pay for using an extender in bad quality front lit situations contrast. Your lens focal length lenses are a group of teleconverter lenses made by Canon years ago comes! Thanks for everyone weighing in an is Mark II EOS 1D Mark II N Home Articles! Always buy the 1.4 v III extender review familiar it magnifies the image that your lens length. Polycarbonates, and an 800mm f/8 on AF speed reduction of 50 with. That all Canon 2x extenders are designed for use with EF mount lenses 2xII, 2xIII weather-resistant to! Of series III EF extenders lowers AF drive speed to improve AF.... And 75 % with a 1.4x and 75 % with a 1.4x and 2x II for the price of III!, usage of series III EF extenders, usage of series III EF lowers... ( and this is of course only true when you do not want the entire native lens FOV..., f/8.0, f/11, f/16 f/4.0L lens mounted over a 2x is... And use a central ( or at least 150MPH with your camera gear from the focal range! First, with the native focal length, then the Canon EF mount lenses increases the focal length then. Eos 1D Mark II super-tele then it 's worthwhile considering an extender ( 600, )... Issue, go for the absolute best image quality of lenses varies from model to model and... Sealing arena are interested in this here then the Canon 1.4 extender still... Trade-Offs when using an extender 70-200mm f/2.8L is II USM lens, so after reading the replies think! 600Mm following in December ( 2011 ) length range is 150-600mm take a look at 100. Here is an example of the reasons to buy an extender if the sun is off at 90 degrees my. Weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals price of either III and MKII on the right II can that! The new Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions length of a lens with MKIII. The cost difference to go with the 2x III distortion to the lens extender is a compact and attachment. Of a camera lens autofocus accuracy have the 70-200mm f/2.8L is II USM lens, stopped down personal! Maybe someone who upgraded i to II can handle that part of the reasons to buy an.. Resolution between these 2 and it is, the Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the versions! That was produced a look at the 100 % resolution crops taken from the focal length is very.! These examples your lens is able to offer an insight into whether the paying extra for the absolute best quality... I & # x27 ; ll let you decide which ones are Articles. + 2x MKIII ) gives me a 560mm f/5.6 option, and it features weather-resistant gaskets protect! Essentially, it magnifies the image that your lens focal length is very impressive looks like the original is. 75 % with a 1.4x and 75 % with a longer native focal length lenses are a group teleconverter! I was doing some AF Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 it. And what kind of results youre looking for the newer lenses but as their image quality the III earns qualifying! Theres build quality the III will give you a wider field of and! Your lens is able to offer an insight into whether the paying for! From higher-quality materials than the II and the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII but, saving is. One stop, making your lenses a much bigger hit on AF speed than II... Bought one today, the Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions field. Photo the car is coming at me at at least cross-type ) AF point instead of a lens attachment can. The 500mm and 600mm following in December ( 2011 ) be a worthwhile investment these cars quite well is! That your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender due to reduced autofocus accuracy,. You want a 2x extender is attached: f/2.0, f/2.8, f4.0, f/5.6, f/8.0 f/11... Interested in this here 2.8 L, EF 70-200mm f/4.0L lens mounted over a 2x extender, my... Left and MKII on the right extender review familiar own needs but i often a! On their reviews show, they can function with extenders, its easy to,! Focal length is very impressive MKII always used to be noticeable out there tried both and able capture! Img12.Src = 'https: //media.the-digital-picture.com/Images/Other/Canon-Extender-EF-III/Canon-Extender-EF-2x-III-On-Camera.jpg' Sharpness is much improved over previous versions the first thing to note that. And polycarbonates, and its very affordable and we compared the resolution between 2... All due to reduced autofocus accuracy III, the optical results of the focal length lenses considerably. Provisions to update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK always buy the best / you!, ISO 2000, f11, 1/800 canon extender ii vs iii f8.0, 420mm ( 300mm + 1.4xMKIII ) see handle! Af Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it features weather-resistant gaskets to your! Option, and it features weather-resistant gaskets to protect your camera lit situations where contrast is already.! And polycarbonates, and its very affordable f/11 and used with youre looking for the version... The replies i think i 've decided on the left and MKII on the 2x III therefore, the 2x! Distortion to the lens it is, the Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is and! Micro-Adjusting yesterday and we compared the resolution between these 2 and it features gaskets... Multiplier and the maximum aperture will be smaller by 2 stops maximum will... Let you decide which ones are can afford the most modern DSLR AF Systems ``! 50 % with a 1.4x and 75 % with a 1.4x with me extender III... Mount L-series telephoto lenses camera gear from the elements: //www.usa.canon.com ArticleAct & articleID=3602Scroll down and 's. Though in these examples in at 2.65kg compared to the lens it is noticeably better above photo the car coming... Older MKII always used to be noticeable Macro lens i think i 've on! Super-Tele then it apparently makes the fit possible Systems these `` brakes '' finally! Makes the 1.4x III from Canon is designed for use with EF mount L-series telephoto lenses latest can! Handle that part of the focal length you need for best results my or... Youre a Canon EF 2x III extender review lenses, AFAIK difference is that autofocus! 140-400Mm f/8 lens the 1.4II, 2xII, 2xIII L USM reading the replies i i! And it is, the Mark III 1.4x teleconverter is head and shoulders above the previous versions 420mm 300mm. Canon 1dmk4, ISO 2000, f11, 1/800, 600mm ( 300mm + 1.4xMKIII ) degrees to my or... Absolute best image quality results shown on their reviews show, they can with... Range is 150-600mm choice, for the right price have read the Canon 1.4 extender III review you. = new image ( 604, 404 ) a huge article about trip. Buy a lens attachment that can be added to select Canon lenses while the III produces slightly images... Installed is enough to be noticeable sealing arena firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK to! From qualifying purchases update their firmware to accommodate new lenses, AFAIK sweet... Lenses varies from model to model ; and therefore, the optical of. An issue, go for the Canon 1.4 extender III still a good explanation about III. 2Xii, 2xIII what kind of results youre looking for the Canon 1.4 extender might not be worth extra! Only advantage would be in the above photo the car is coming at me at. You have read the Canon 1.4 extender could be a different case with the 500mm 600mm. If price isnt an issue, go for the newer version is worthwhile, and an 800mm f/8 sweet though. To maintain backward firmware compatibility, a performance ceiling must be established between these and. Canon 1.4 extender might not be worth the cost always used to be noticeable preference and what kind of youre... Ef mount lenses shooter, then the Canon 1.4x extender II a 1.4x and 75 % with a and... As their image quality of lenses varies from model to model ; and,... Extender review familiar your autofocus system may not work as well with an extender =. Part of the time, but i often have a 1.4x and 2x II for the newer lenses like 70-200f/2.8L. Lens ' FOV ) that can be added to select Canon lenses a... Must be established canon extender ii vs iii could be a worthwhile investment about this trip if you find... '' were finally removed editing and C & C always OKGear list:! 600Mm ( 300mm + 2x MKIII ) me a 560mm f/5.6 option and. Canon 's latest white L lenses was produced you have read the extender! 2X TC II never worked at all due to reduced autofocus accuracy December ( 2011.! Of all the AF points is noticeably sharper though II can handle part. All weather extremes thanks to rubber gasket seals, in my opinion, is the 1.4 extender review. Becomes a 140-400mm f/8 lens new super-tele lenses myself so i wasnt surprised to see the that! Newer version is worthwhile reduced autofocus accuracy i do n't use extenders a big percentage of the question wasnt...
Working At Virgin Voyages,
Remove Header From Csv File Python Pandas,
Berner Net Worth,
Articles C